Evaluation of various irrigation management for the automation of the sprinkler irrigation system

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 MS.c graduated of Irrigation and drainage, Department of Water Science and Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.

2 Associate professor, Department of Water Science and Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.

3 Ph.D student of Irrigation and drainage, Department of Water Science and Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.

4 Ph.D graduated of Irrigation and drainage, Department of Water Science and Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.

Abstract

In Iran, pressurized irrigation systems cover a large area of agricultural land, but water use efficiency remains low because farmers tend to do deficit (over) - irrigation due to their lack of knowledge of crop water requirements. To address this issue, irrigation systems can be automated, and it is important to estimate crop water requirements accurately. This can be done based on soil moisture deficit or meteorological data. The water required can then be applied using a volume meter or by determining irrigation time based on the sprinkler flow rate. The study aimed to compare crop water requirement estimates based on soil moisture deficit and meteorological data, as well as the amount of water applied using volume and time-based methods.

The study was conducted in the research farm of Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran, on a sprinkler irrigation system equipped with pressure and flow measuring devices, pressure switches, and electrical valves. The field was under corn cultivation, and four types of irrigation management were evaluated, which included a combination of two methods of determining crop water requirement (soil moisture deficiency and meteorological data) and two methods of irrigation application (time or volume). The four treatments were soil moisture - time (MT), soil moisture - volume (MV), weather - time (WT), and weather - volume (WV). The crop water requirement was calculated using the Penman-Monteith formula based on daily weather data. Soil moisture was measured at different depths one day before irrigation, and the soil moisture deficit was calculated to determine the crop water requirement based on soil moisture. The irrigation volume for each sprinkler in the irrigation cycle was calculated using equations that written in the paper.
In the volumetric-based method (treatments WV and MV), the volume of water applied was measured using a water meter with a precision of 0.1 liters, and irrigation was stopped after passing the required volume of water. In the time-based method (treatments WT and MT), the irrigation time was calculated by dividing the irrigation volume by the average flow rate of the sprinklers (3 liters per second), and irrigation was stopped after the calculated duration. The actual sprinkler flow rate was calculated based on the volume of applied water and irrigation time in each treatment and irrigation round. Crop yield was measured at the time of harvest in the studied treatments and a control treatment managed by the Faculty of Agriculture. The irrigation treatments were not applied in the first month of the growth period due to field limitations.

The results show that the crop water requirement calculated based on meteorological data at the beginning and end of the growing period was more than the method based on soil moisture. In total, the amount of crop water requirement calculated based on soil moisture was 8% more than the meteorological-based method. The volume of applied water in treatments of MT and WT was 14 and 8% more than in MV and WV treatments, respectively.

The actual flow rate of sprinklers was different from the design flow rate due to irrigation situations in other parts of the farm. The average discharge of sprinklers (12 irrigation events) in WT, MT, WV, and MV treatments was 2.79, 3.03, 3.27, and 3.12 l/s, respectively. The irrigation time in volume and time-based methods also showed a significant difference. The irrigation time in MT and MV treatments was 10 and 18% longer than in WT and WV treatments, respectively. 
The study found that due to the non-uniformity of sprinkler discharge, applying irrigation by volume method is better than the time-based method. The results suggest that the MV treatment, which determined the amount of irrigation based on soil moisture deficit and applied it using a volumetric method, is a suitable option for automating sprinkler irrigation systems in the studied region.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Abolpour, B., Sharifi, M., Bazrafshan, M., & Jorenush, M. H. (2021). Intelligent management of Irrigation Planning on Increasing the Water Use Productivity in Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Irrigation and Water Engineering, 12(2), 156-170.             http://dx.doi: 10.22125/iwe.2021.142031. [in Persian]      
Allen, R. G., Monteith, J. L., Perrier, A., Pereira, L. S., & Segeren, A. (1991). Report of the Expert Consultation on Procedures for Revision of FAO Guidelines for Prediction of Crop Water Requirements. Land and water development division. FAO. Roma (Italia). https://www.fao.org/publications/card/en/c/cb7185en.
Alizadeh, A. (2005). Principles and Operations of Drip Irrigation. Astan Qods Razavi. Imam Reza University (AS) Publishers. [in Persian]
Alizadeh, A., Dehghani Sanij, H., & Mousavi, M. (2010). The Effect of Using Real-time Field Meteorological Data in Calculating the Irrigation Requirement on Increasing the Efficiency of Water Consumption in Fodder Corn. Irrigation and Drainage Journal 2(4), 308-318. https://www.sid.ir/paper/131546/fa. [in Persian] 
Barati, K., Abedikoupaee, J., Darvishi, E., Azari, A., & Yousefi, A. (2018). Estimation of Net Irrigation Requirement of the Crop Pattern in Kermanshah Plain and Comparison with the Data in the National Water Document. Journal of Water Research in Agriculture, 32(4), 543-553.
      http://dx.doi: 10.22092/jwra.2019.118523. [in Persian]       
Camp, C.R., Karlen, D. L. & Lambert, J.R. (1985). Irrigation Scheduling and Row Configurations for Corn in the Southeastern Coastal Plain. Trans. ASAE. 28(4), 59-65. https://www.ars.usda.gov/ARSUserFiles/60820000/Manuscripts/1985-1990/Man138.pdf.
Camposeo, S. & Rubino, P. (2003). Effect of Irrigation Frequency on Root Water Uptake in sugar Beet. Plant and Soil 253, 301–309. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024801312711.
Edison, SSR. (2011). Smart Irrigation Control System. Thesis at Bethlahem Institute of Engineering, Karungal. Available online at: www.worldcolleges. info.pdf.
Manashti, M. J., Farhadi Bansouleh, B., Amirian, S., Sadeghi, G. H., Kermajani, M. Mohammadnezhad, R., Amjadian, E. & Rezaei, S. (2013). Design and Implementation of a Web Based Automation System for Sprinkler Irrigation System. The Second International Conference on Agriculture and Natural Resources,Razi Univercity, Kermanshah, Iran, 1134-1136. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261098083
Mirmousavi, H., Panahi, H., Akbari, H., & Akbarzadeh, Y. (2012). Calibration Methods to Estimate Reference Crop Evapotranspiration and Calculated Potential Water Requirements of Olive Plant in Kermanshah Province. Geography and Environmental Sustainability, 2(2), 45-64. https://ges.razi.ac.ir/article_166_en.html?lang=fa. [In Persian]  
Al-Naji, A., Fakhri, A.B., Gharghan, S.K. & Chahl, J. (2021) .Soil color analysis based on a RGB camera and an artificial neural network towards smart irrigation: A pilot study. Heliyon, 7(1), e06078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06078
Pourgholam Amiji, M. (2021). The Benefits, Applications, and Challenges of the IoT in Irrigation. Water Management in Agriculture, 7(2), 47-66.  https://wmaj.iaid.ir/article_128249.html. [In Persian]      
Rehman, A.U., Abbasi, A. Z., Islam, N., & Shaikh, Z. A. (2014). A Review of Wireless Sensors and Networks' Applications in Agriculture. Computer standards and interfaces 36(2), 263-270. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.csi.2011.03.004.
Sable, R., Kolekar, S., Gawde, A., Takle, S., & Pednekar1, A. (2019). A Review on Different Irrigation Methods. International Journal of Applied Agricultural Research, 14(1), 49-60. https://www.ripublication.com/ijaar19/ijaarv14n1_06.pdf
Saeedolzakerin, A. N., Nazari, B., & Etedali, H. R. (2019). Effectiveness of smart landscape irrigation systems in reducing water usage (Case study: Razi Park, Tehran). Journal of Water and Sustainable Development 6 (1),  23-28. https://doi.org/10.22067/jwsd.v6i1.71208. [In Persian]      
Silva, D., Meza, F. J., & Varas, E. (2010). Estimating Reference Evapotranspiration (ETo) Using Numerical Weather Forecast Data in Central Chile. Journal of hydrology 382(1), 64-71. https://doi.org: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.12.018.
Torres, A. F., Walker, W.R., & McKee, M. (2010). Forecasting Daily Potential Evapotranspiration Using Machine Learning and Limited Climatic Data. Agricultural Water Management, 98(4), 553-562. https://doi.org: 10.1016/j.agwat.2010.10.012.
Touil, S., Richa, A., Fizir, M., Argente García, J.A., &  Skarmeta Gómez, A.F.(2022). A review on smart irrigation management strategies and their effect on water savings and crop yield.Irrigation and Drainage. 71 (5), 1396-1416. https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.2735
Advanced Technologies in Water Efficiency
Volume 3, Issue 3
September 2023
Pages 1-19

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 30 May 2023
  • Revise Date: 28 July 2023
  • Accept Date: 25 September 2023

Share

How to cite

Statistics